Fun place to post for a bit

The accusation of antisemitism can sometimes be applied inconsistently, creating perceptions of a double standard. This occurs when similar actions or criticisms are judged differently depending on the context, actors involved, or the framing of the issue. Below are examples illustrating this phenomenon, drawn from patterns observed in public discourse, historical events, and media discussions, while avoiding speculative or unverified claims:
1. Criticism of Israel vs. Other Nations
• Double Standard: Criticizing Israel’s policies, such as its treatment of Palestinians or military actions, is often labeled antisemitic, even when the critique focuses on government actions rather than Jewish people. Similar criticisms of other nations’ policies (e.g., China’s Uyghur policies or Saudi Arabia’s human rights record) are less frequently accused of targeting an ethnic or religious group.
• Example: In 2019, U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar faced accusations of antisemitism for tweets questioning the influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups like AIPAC, with critics framing her comments as invoking antisemitic tropes about Jewish influence. Meanwhile, critiques of lobbying by other groups, like the NRA or fossil fuel industries, rarely face equivalent accusations of ethnic or religious bias, even when phrased similarly.

Grok seems to be unable to be critical of Jews or Israel in the way that I like. When I ask about antisemitism displaying a double standard I would expect to hear that other ethnicities don’t have similar protections or words but Grok doesn’t seem to feel that that is important because it was trained on centuries worth of…I don’t know what and likely is programmed that way.

Maybe on something that’s not the JQ it would work.

And no visas required for Argie bros. Ty senor Trumpo.

>>512030857

ILY anon!

https://youtu.be/04v-SdKeEpE