>>29276177
You should be spoonfeeding if you're making the claim otherwise I have no reason to believe you. What you've provided as proof is not helpful.
Why the fuck would any organization, yes even a chink one, put a real person and real vehicle at risk just to demonstrate something that can easily be shown in a simple cartoon? Which is something Chinese companies have done before such as this video? The guy is gargling water at the end of the video, you're saying they had a crew behind him ready to save him and the tow the vehicle out of the water? So they will pay for his potential medical bills and the towing services? Ruin the electric components of a perfectly workable vehicle in the process?
How does this make any sense?