>>106276646
>>106264720
Let me add one thing. I am only interested in how anonymous it is compared to Veilid.

I am not too interested in this:
>If the Internet is partially down, Tor/I2P mostly die unless relays remain online. GNUnet can keep running via ad-hoc mesh or local transport backbones – built for hostile, partitioned, or censored networks.

It seems rather useless unless you live in PRC or something, and then the government would probably still shut you down.

Also these alternate routes it would take would likely be slow and not too useful unless we're talking about some nuclear holocaust situation.

Although I guess it might be mildly useful in the case of some major fiber cuts and your ISP lacks access to the remaining working Tier 1 providers