>>536282882
>"Why would the tiny toy chica be missing her beak?"
Tbh I'm not 100% sure what this one meant, but that doesn't mean "DreamTheory" is the only correct conclusion. Maybe Scott just said it to help clarify the nature of the "toy" Toy Animatronics. Before this hint, the GTLive people were wondering why they were present in a game set before 1987; it makes sense that the "Toy Animatronics" were based on toys
>"What is seen in the shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child."
The Crying Child saw something which terrified him but was actually innocent. I think the main reason for this is to better communicate that FNAF4's minigames were taking place before any events we were aware of that point; no dead kids, no possessed animatronics, etc, etc. It was the earliest game in the series for a very long time, and only beaten out now in that department by SotM
>Four games. One Story.
Scott's telling the audience that the player during the night gameplay is the same person we've been playing in every single game up to that point. The reversed FNAF1 call from Phone Guy ties 4's night player to Mike Schmidt, who is in turn tied to Fritz Smith by way of their similar pink slip firings. The FNAF3 guard makes most sense as someone who has some type of connection/familiarity with the spirits of the children due to their active involvement in helping to set up (alongside the Puppet) the "Happiest Day" minigame, which itself connects to the CC by way of its obvious similarities to his birthday party, with the difference here being he now has friends present to comfort him, instead of his brother and bullies who unintentionally murdered him. The story of FNAF4 recontextualised the series as the journey of Mike on a quest to help the soul of his little brother move on, helping the other kids too in the process
>>536284143
Didn't say it was. I'm saying MikeDreamer was ALWAYS the case, disproving DreamTheory unless you believe in MikeVictim, which is also retarded