>>518699706
>Bride of Christ is divided
Nope, it's not. Romans are outside of the Temple of God, they have another Gospel, they worship Rome and they have the number of the son of perdition in their forehead.
Vicarvs Filii Dei V+I+C+I+V+I+L+I+I+D+I = 666
They are idolaters, they worship the "queen of heaven", they speak to dead people, their whole religion is Roman in nature, it is mixed with paganism, it is an abomination before God. They don't read the Bible and they don't care in the slightest about the Bible. They don't read what the text is about in contex and with guidance by the Holy Spirit, they rather try to fit a handful of Bible verses into their Roman religion, not trying to read the entire text and seeking understanding, as it defines itself, but rather try to read some preconceived religious bias into the text that isn't there at all. And if you point it out they just say "nuh uh", because Rome is their god. They don't have communion with Christ, they have communion with the altar of Rome, with devils and demons that coopt the Gospel for their own power grip on the people.
The temple of God are Christians (1Corinthians 3:16; 2Corinthians 6:16), not a blasphemous Roman organization, Rome is outside of the Temple full of heathens. They call this son of perdition their "holy father", yet we shall call no one on earth our "father" (as in worship), because one is our Father which is in heaven. But if I tell those Romans that Jesus Christ is the Father Himself in the flesh (John 14:9), THAT they have a problem with and say "NOO Jesus is not the father, he is the SON", but the pope is "the holy father". They have a paganistic understanding of the Lord (JHVH) Jesus (born man=son) Christ (Holy Spirit) and worship many gods and idols. Rome coopted the Gospel for their own political power grip, they don't own Christ. Same goes for Orthodoxy, although they are slightly less annoying, but they too are a remnant of Roman concepts and are stuck to their false ideas.