>>461787
broski, I think the drafts I shat out show more understanding of this than the ones you provided. also you didn't make em go heraldry.
you made em go cheap looking pseudo-luxury brand. :^)

>>461754
>you really think that the generic retail-"luxury" logo says "racing" and "elite car manufacturing" more than the very first original?!?!

>>461761
>but now it feels to be a luxury jewel store logo more than a high-end hypercar brand based on bugatti.

you seem to not understand that your "client" doesn't want to do collabs with louis vuitton, but wants a caricature toy logo for a game that screams HYPERCAR LIKE BUGATTI.
as said before. you know industry jargon, but your design talent I have yet to witness

>puma?!