>>40701017
There’s a few problems with this dissertation, but what stands out to me rn is that it does the "why can’t you just be a feminine man or a masculine woman" unironically, and it posits that we skipped over this supposed healthy middle ground, forcing all those who transcend their gender role to transition which is absurd.
As if butch women haven’t been getting the cops called on them in the bathroom and twinky cute faggots haven’t been getting their teeth kicked in enough, op assumes that society is heathy enough to tolerate the detractors from gender norms, and while it could be done in a naive progressive sheltered innocence (which I doubt because they bought into the were making these people transition rhetoric), it’s more likely it’s a purposeful appropriation of the rhetoric because op just doesn’t like looking at trannies and needs to convince “fellow wokes”
In a vacuum the OP might have had some points, but I really don’t have much reason to give them today