>>16772393
>I know you don't actually care about answers
No, I really don't, not anymore.
You know I thought it was bad when I believed the analogy was like
>>16772119, but the more I dig into this whole thing the worse it gets.
Take the famous GW150914 for example, you can't even see if there are actually blackholes there with other devices like a telescope. And given the fact apparently no blackhole merge can be confirmed by any other device, using that analogy, it's not people retroactively claiming to have detected somebody coughing on the planet, it's people retroactively claiming they have a magic device that can detect somebody invisible casting a spell confirming magic is real.
OH, and black hole mergers are supposed to take millions to billions of years, but apparently it only releases a 0.2 seconds signal catchable by LIGO, and we just happened to catch it.
It's so mind boggling pseud it's unbelievable.
