>>28995165
I told you where to find it, you just dont like being an idiot.
>>28995204
Absolutely. The key is where this comes from: are you actually physically attracted to men, or is it more for humiliation of being watched by your 'GF'?
I AM attracted to *some* men. I am very particular about the body type and personality. I could see myself actually falling in love with the right man and being used as a woman in all aspects - from the bedroom to 'housewife' stuff. -HOWEVER- I do like women too.
>>28995429
I think youre the one thats 'hyper focused' here and didnt even really get it right. Its very simple and its all listed above. These are all the most widely accepted definitions; just like what generation youre in. Some will claim 81 is Gen X still but the most widely accepted definition is 1980 being the last year. And there will always be some overlap where like Elder Millenials espouse more Gen X traits. Same with Sissy/Femboy/Crossdresser. There will always be some overlap and trying to micro focus on details and outliers just 'to be right' is silly. Its very simple and its been listed by multiple Anons here, and its all over The World Wide Internets. Whether you like it or not or agree or not doesn't matter. There is a very discernable difference in each category.
>>28998555
You could just leave if you dont like it.
Now if yall will excuse me, I have to go finish prepping my asshole and getting dressed for my BBC today.