>>96574219
>>Using the legendary type more sparingly and not slapping it on every creature?
I still don't understand why they still shit that many legendaries since most of them aren't even story relevant or even have a single line of background. Most of them aren't even mechanically unique. Do we really need another UG legendary creature that draw cards and put land into play? Do we really need another GW legendary that care about +1/+1 counters? Even if you care about EDH they just seem like you could take any generic EDH deck build around the mechanic , change at most 10 cards and swap the commander.