>>64383837
>plausible bullshitery
>a bulleting that shows the PG-7 has 2-3 times more pH at 250m than an early M72
>doesn't provides a comparative plot for other systems BUT takes the most favorable interpretation for his narrative
You lie as you breath, not different than a retard firehosing. You might not like the 'encyclopedic' figures but if you're gonna do comparisons better than that you have to use the same methodology for both systems... (like picrel taked from a comparison of the 1980s between M72 and its successors)

>The pH for both M72 and RPG-7 was about 50% at 200m
lol