>>23458997
History reader who just noticed the upper corner of the screen has a white exclamation mark here, you just reversed my previous happiness with your post. Not only is it lacking in any self awareness saying others are gaslighting you, calling others disingenuous, or calling being asked for a source spoonfeeding rather than a basic requirement when giving information to prove you aren't making things up, you have your head up your own ass with your self-righteousness. You're not debunking anything and especially not history. Didn't those replies already answer you with viable ways to recreate organic material from asteroids? You didn't address them. You conveniently ignore anything refuting you while accusing others you hypocrite.

Looks like separating paragraphs this way is how most here fo it so I will do it to better format this point. NO, you complain historically illiterate dumbass. They had some projects doing that but that was not the absolute nor was it accurate considering their quality or lack of quality. Many weapons they made for mass production or the intent to mass produce before it turned infeasible. What you call good enough was never good enough because the industrial capabilities of Nazi Germany were very inferior and they knew it. Much of their tanks and industries were made with the help of Ford, GM, and other American car companies. Their obsession with miracle war winning weapons was because they knew deep down that they were way inferior to many of their enemies and needed an ace in the hole. Anything remotely just good enough isn't enough because they would be inferior in quantity and quality to their enemies. They just plain don't have the industry by themselves nor the resources and made attempts into Africa just for resources. The invasion of Caucasus in the Soviet Union was one of many desperate bids for resources they direly needed. Nothing straightforward would have won and it didn't matter because no matter how efficiently