>>82110301
Yeah, by actually posting on topic titles you just don't like because they feature interesting characters rather than bland self-inserts

I'm perfectly on-topic, far more than you, I'm actually posting shit from actual foidporn magazines. You're just mad that given that it targets actual sexhavers rather than pathetic losers like you you don't like it and call it "derailing".

Have another one from the newest &Flower, it's really good:
>Splash image of course prominently describes and details their relationship because sexhavers are drawn to that kind of stuff
>Prominently lists it as mentally unstable girl x trash younger boy because sexhavers don't want plain self-inserts, they want an actual dynamic and characters
>Protagonist, however mentally unstable is still pretty
>NOOO, I SEEETHE, D... DO HETEROSEXUAL WOMEN REALLY LIKE THIS/ INTERESTING CHARACTERS? NOOOO, THAT IS MALE GAZE, NOOO, BLANDOS ONLY, ARE TRANNIES READING THIS OR SOMETHING? HOW CAN I SELF-INSERT WHEN THE PROTAGONIST ISN'T A LOSER LIKE ME?

stfu, you've contributed nothing to this thread but the disgusting smell of your virginity.