pee/rape warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11306933/#11307551
edit #14
>>11357500
oh, wow; i see what you mean about the precum. i thought i figured out the black outline, because my first attempt included the black outline in what to select and put over the smegma, and i thought making it translucent (which was the method i settled on to work around the precum) looked so bad. but, i see, that where the black outline isn't transparent, it looks really good, and must be what i felt was missing in my trying to preserve the integrity of the precum
and, i could tell that the left side of the foreskin was obfuscating stuff from our perspective, whereas the right side wasn't, but i still wanted to add a gratuitous amount of smegma, so i just ignored that. i tried to preserve that kinda by making an effort to make the smegma on the left less girthy than the smegma on the right, but since i drowned the whole thing in cope fog anyway you can't really tell. i purposely avoided providing a non-fog version of the edit, since i felt you couldn't add any new information on how i could do it better (considering i either gave up on your tips or didn't feel i did them confidently at all), and didn't want to appear as if i was trying to bum the same thing off of you... and, honestly, after exporting them (caption and captionless) just now, i feel it looks so bad because- again-, i feel the light color of the smegma looks so bad against the dark skin color of the glans. so idk if i even want to share them. i think i'm happy with my obfuscating fog cope. i just feel i have to learn a style that can do strokes of smegma to do dark skin justice, so doing that edit was doomed from the start, to me
making the precum a cohesive thing makes it better, too, i think. but i can't imagine ever doing things like that yet, but it's interesting seeing you do it, to affirm it's possible, so i can be on the lookout for opportunities to do things like that one day