>>96485161
Retarded interpretation of the Tarkin Doctrine. Again, zero proof in the fucking films or anywhere in media that Venators were avandoned. The data comes from two sources: One is Saxton, who is well known for ignoring basic lore, the other one is the fucking Force Unleashed guide. TFU, the game known for introducing abominations like Starkiller or the weird Halo gunship into the lore. Yeah right
Thinking that the Tarkin Doctrine is "scare people with le big ships" is as braindead as genuinely thinking TIEs lack shields and have solar panels
Acclamator is not an attack vessel, it was used as that early on alongside cheap conversions of consular and civilian vessels because there just weren't other ships to do the job, and it did its role amazingly well. Remember that the Venator is midwar and the Victory is after, unless you're a retard who follows TCW which pushed both to the first month of the war in order to force its shitty fanfiction
>>96485338
Acclamator is not better than a Venator, it's a different fucking role. It being smaller is not necessarily a benefit, Venators also have an invasion force (though they also had Acclamators as support to bolster them), the operational range would be smaller if anything and it makes no fucking sense that the Venator would have less guns than the Acclamator, and the statbooks are just fucking retarded and need to be reworked
Overall this is just showing one thing, people writing statbooks have no fucking clue what they're doing and make shit up on the spot without thinking twice