>>520303907
>I have alot of stress in general then again who doesn't. but luckily I have a private woodland so I pretty much just spend all my time outside.
Humans are territorial. If everyone could have a house with a parcel of land out back, people would be stronger. Keep in mind, urbanites have to "share" everything and that particular set of "institutional" programming starts early. Children who are raised to give all they have, become bitter as they grow up because they've never had much that was their own, save maybe their rooms. This is why they often let it fall into disarray growing up, because it's theirs, a slice of freedom where no one can change how it's arranged BUT, because they've never had of their own, they don't know how to take care of it.
People who have had little to nothing, while on paper having "everything" naturally become bitter, anxious, neurotic weirdos. Abundance without ownership. Imagine being coerced to be "selfless" to the degree that it's harmful psychologically; be it coercion, gaslighting, guilt, or rote habituation. The idea is to make humans more "empathic" but humans naturally want to help those who can't help themselves. It's the greedy ones, who have the ability but not the will or drive, to do for themselves that we are always asked to share with.
This is why cultures that thrive on communal living breed nothing but retards. Without something of your own, you have zero desire to WORK for more and begging is incentivized. This is also why every 3rd world nation has such huge problems with corruption; everyone, powerful or not always has their hand out for gibs and since no one respects property (no sense of ownership), they're always at each others throat's in violent genocidal levels of gibsmedatforfree. If they spent half such energy on just building something of their own, they'd have normal developed nations.
But if nothing is theirs, then everything is theirs. So take, whether offered or not.