>>29449724
>but wouldn't bullet size affect how resistant the round is to wind interference?
yeah marginally
and larger rounds generally have more pressure and are faster and shoot straighter but that retard thought like having big bullets with small targets makes it harder to hit or something, it was a very confused argument.
>Thinking about the size difference, I don't expect the effects to be large, but they'd still be there.
yeah it's marginally true.
I think the point he was making was it was a particularly good shot, but even if the shooter was on the roof (which would be uncommon for assassinations, usually the distant shooter is the patsy and the real killer is actually someone on security detail relatively close) the shot wasn't particularly difficult. You can train most people to hit a target at 200 yards with a hunting rifle in about a half hour at the range.
>Greater surface area means easier to push sideways, but the square-cube law should still more than compensate for that.
yeah you're technically correct and thought about this much more than that nogunz retard.
