>>41012196
>But others are allowed to insert their interpretations?
Yes. Those are actual interpretations. Christfag responses in this thread (and broadly throughout the world) are a very crude and simple computation:
>IF figure =/= jesus, god, christfag figure
>THEN figure = Satan, evil, bad
It's not an interpretation, no thought goes into it. It's an allergy, and if some faggot with a nut allergy told me to throw my almonds away I'd tell him to eat shit too.
>Where does the line get drawn?
Christfaggotry. It's categorically not occult because it is THE major western religion. It's like when cops try to get in on punk culture.
>Why is that one thing off limits?
See above. You can't even deny that I'm right; the first christfag response immediately warned that the Green Man is trying to "deceive" people, and I'm pretty sure you (hard to tell, you're all pretty much the same guy) were the one that wrote him off as a demon. You didn't want to discuss the topic, you immediately demonized it. You people literally are not able to deviate from that if-then computation.