>>17914448
>there is no proof that race affects inteligence
But I literally posted proof and here's more. If you want an in-depth discussion of the scientific evidence we could have gone to /sci/ years ago, until people like you cried to the mods and started getting those threads banned.
>relying on "muh evolution" don't make any sense either because humans stopped evolving the natural way the moment they developed technology
Did humans stop "evolving the natural way" with stone tools and fire? The brutal forces of natural selection ceased way back then? We are talking about hunter gatherers for much of this period as well, the most significant move out of Africa into vastly new environments 70000 to 50000 years ago.
As I said
>they absolutely refuse to discuss it, preferring to censor and "cancel" anyone and anything who touches it with a 50 foot pole
This is another method of avoiding debate, to drop some quippy yet spurious argument that would be ok for facebook or twitter or would be praised by r*dditors where people base their judgment on "what would people think if I had this opinion" and leave it at that. Because your influence over society is so strong you don't need to actually prove your point and I think deep down you know you can't anyway.