>>76585107
>>76585206
It does appear to be that a lot of women aren't into guys with huge muscles. The only two women irl (sister and ex) I've talked to about this seem to have the same opinion. They say guys like Sam Sulek don't appeal to them at all, ex said she'd rather have a skinny/normal looking guy than one who looks like Sam Sulek. And sister and ex both expressed they like more toned looking physiques, like the kind you see in calisthenics bros. Pic rel is what ex claimed to be the perfect physique she finds the hottest for a man. I saved it from some board on here long ago, it's some anon's. So it seems like women like muscles that look big but not huge like with bodybuilders. They like physiques that could be categorized as 'athletic'.

But here's the thing - even if most women might not like huge muscles, it doesn't mean that there don't exist women out there who probably get their panties drenched just being in the presence of guys with physiques like in OP's pic. It might just be that they're uncommon. The opposite could also be true that women who dislike bodybuilders could be over-represented online (maybe even irl) due to reasons. But the point is that it's very likely that if you go out there, you are bound to run into women at some point who will be turned on like crazy by your body. Think about it in terms of your own self and your preferences towards women. Like for myself for example, I probably wouldn't date or marry a bimbo or a girl with gigantic, oversized titties. But there ain't no way I'll pass up on the opportunity to fuck them. I find them hot and I'd love to have sex with them even if I may not consider them ideal. Women are probably the same.