>>128317677
>Rip off the cover of Sgt. Peppers
>Decades later people still say the music rips it off even though it goes for a completely different sound
>People judge it based on that association and often make it apparent they've never even tried to listen to it
People are LITERALLY judging this album by its cover, it's actually quite neat. It's odd for a Rolling Stones album yes, but they were clearly going down this path for a while if you follow their 60s output.

>>149769922
>Discord, obscure forums, their local comic and game shop
That's kind of antithetical to the point of an anonymous online message board isn't it? You're not supposed to have a name attached
I've had some good Discord servers and ither groups but they never have the same atmosphere /co/ has, or the sort of freedom to talk about any related topic. Having a name attached to a post humanizes them, gives you more "responsibility", sometimes you don't want that

>>149438801
Is this really what they're saying on PBS now?
Fucking shit it's really gone downhill since McLaughlin died hasn't it