>>151423602
>>151424177
When Peyton, Eli, Rodgers, and Brees were all in their prime in the early 2010s Brady went a decade without winning a ring. He had to wait for all of them to reach the retirement age to start ringpadding against the new generation of children who didn't know how to read defenses.

The analogy is Mahomes getting his ass beat once Allen, Lamar, and Burrow reached their prime and Mahomes having to wait 10 years for all of them to reach their late 30s to start winning again.

FACT: Brady couldn't beat Peyton, Eli, Rodgers, and Brees in their prime so he went ringless for a decade.

He waited for those guys to reach retirement age to start winning against a new generation of rookies.

That would be like Mahomes getting bootyblast by Allen and Lamar for a decade and waiting for them to retire to start winning.

>>150181620
When Brady had to play prime Peyton, Eli, and Brees he went a decade without winning a ring.

He waited for them to get old, injured, or retired to start ringpadding against a new generation of mobile rookie QBs who didn't know how to read defenses.

>>150114022
>MVP voters refused to admit Brady was the straw that stirred the drink for years and were still screwing him over
You're rewriting history. Brady in his 20s wasn't him. Peyton was him. Mahomes was him. It wasn't until he got Moss at age 30 did he blossom into an elite player. The Rodgers, Mannings, and Brees of the world took his lunch money and he went a decade without winning a ring. He outlasted them and waited for guys like Peyton to retire to start ringpadding against newborn babies like Mahomes who didn't know how to read defenses yet. Look at picrel.