>>717921558
>>"lolol you didn't even address all of his claims you didn't watch the entire video!"
I've seen sentiment expressed in Mauler and PatricianTV (both charmless pseuds) and it perfectly illustrates the problem with their understanding of logic. When disproving an argument, you don't have to contradict every single point. All you have to do is determine the main assertion or supposition on which the following arguments rest (e.g. a main thesis) and undermine it, and the rest of their points fall with it. Anyone screeching about "well you didn't counter ALL 7 trillion of my points!" is fucking retarded and probably just trying to gish gallop.