>>534792153
>you’re doing the process exactly backwards.
>You are starting with a preconceived notion and then are molding your own perceptions around it.
>You cherrypick incidents, misrepresent in game occurrences
Bloody heavens, thank you. This guy has been making "headcanons" while calling them "theories" AND treating them as "facts".
The point of making headcanons is taking very scarce information and filling the blanks to make an idea you concede as fictional regardless of discussion. Theorizing comes from taking incomplete information and making a hypothesis based on it, open to discussion.
If Susannefag called his diatribes headcanons (cause that's ultimately what they are) it would be pretty much okay, but instead he is shoving it down people's throats as if they were facts.
Also, I STILL don't understand where this headcanon even comes from cause it's ignoring a lot of important details from both Odyssey and Bananza... which even goes beyond the concept of making a headcanon when headcanons are often grounded in the reality of the source material (Then again I cant really say myself cause I haven't played either, so you are on your own here lol.)
