>>534766380
>can't balance for shit
Nah, they've done pretty alright overall lately. The whole problem is the very concept of a support class was very likely to be broken af.
>>534766307
I have no idea how shit the design was on release or even now because I don't want to play the scaley race. They should've added more support specs if they were going to go that route but the amount of work they would've had to do would be insane. Stick with 5-man but go to 1 support, 2 dps when everyone already plays dps? Change the game to be 6man dungeon-based but then they'd have to balance around that? The whole concept was an objective failure unless they put a ton of effort into it, which they can't even remotely afford to do lol.
I guess the only way I could remotely consider it a 'success' is if they knew it would be OP af based on the simple design of being a support and decided to just throw 1 class out there to get some iterations on how the player base would respond.
