>>150024080
Ok you're kinda stretching the truth here. I'm not saying he should be a performer like he imagined at the beginning when he was Spider-Man. And at the beginning of the story Peter being someone who isn't objectivist is kinda the point. After the origin happens and he learns the moral of the story "with great power" that is basically Ditko planting the seed for him to become an objectivist analogue.
Ditko now has Peter using his powers responsibly (according to objectivism) which is helping others while still helping people like Aunt May or Betty. He is doing it within his current means which is due to his poor background and lack of certain skills like finance or persuasive skills. Stan had a say in the beginning as well so yeah he isn't a complete analogue but there are elements there.
There are also other ways for him to profit off being Spider-Man while still maintaining those principles. If Peter created the marketable design he has with the costume couldn't he then find a legal way to sell merch and profit from that? Then he could use that greater amount of money to benefit others? I don't fully know what objectivists think of that idea though.