>>107049274
Idk I did it just fine with a single 7900xtx and 7900 xt and I got spited a ton anyways?
And I was getting spited because Im a codelet who didnt know how to use pow or anti-https spam prevention. And I found it funny. Obviously I would go through the effort of learning or paying someone to help me prevent this.
I dont even know what my t/s rate was, just it was JUST enough for alot of anons though!
I think the most I ever saw at once was like... 13 I think?
I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe CPUmaxxing isnt hostable.

>>107049302
I do not understand this post.
>>107049309
not in a million years