>>150091834
I understood it just fine, moron. Your point is that Superman is recognisable and has inherent flexibility due to the nature of his creation. But that's not true as Superman requires so many things to be recognisably Superman that he is barred from naturally being woven into tons upon tons of stories and genres. Whether you can write a one-off comedic or western or horror story about Superman is besides the point. The core argument is that Batman can naturally be woven into any story, in any time and place, and work with very few changes to his person. Batman is flexible and versatile, Superman is even more rigid than most capecharacters.