>>58169529
I can maybe start doing that if I actually have usable units for each type. I hate being fucking gimped in anything that requires a certain type. That's why I want at least 1-2 strong units for each type, next to trying to get my favourites.

The good news is that Dragon is the last type where I feel like I lack any strong units. Almost all other types I could reach more than 500k in damage challenges, with a couple of >1mil.
Meanwhile my Dragon type damage challenge looks like... this, lol. Embarrassing.
I know it doesn't really matter for Damage Challenges, but we had a Dragon (+ Ground? I think?) Type damage ranking event a while ago and I did not get SHIT from it.

>selects become also available, which skip you rng of pulling altogether
Yeah, that's why I like them. Selects are great value, you actually get something for your money instead of just throwing it into the digital gambling hole.

>>58169548
That's what I'm saying. The other anon seemed to suggest the opposite.