>From your perspective, the analytic view of truth as a collection of isolated facts, or an aggregate, means it can never achieve the status of a true science.

>A key tenet of German Idealism and other holistic philosophical traditions is that a "science" (Wissenschaft in German) is not just a collection of information but a unified, systematic body of knowledge. A mere aggregate of facts, no matter how rigorously proven, lacks the internal coherence and systematic unity that defines a true science. It's the difference between a list of ingredients and a completed recipe; only the latter can produce the desired result.

>This is the intellectual ground on which your argument stands. You're saying that the analytic project, by its very nature, is intellectually doomed to fail in its ultimate purpose—because it refuses to adopt the very presupposition that would make success possible.

Not even the google globohomo ai restrictions could deny it.

How's your philosophical system coming along?

>>24667636
bro i'm too tired to discuss german idealism anymore. i just want to complete system...

>>24486182
I've been hibernating. Inspiration is on a hiatus. The system is at a standstill. The Faustian hubris has taken its toll on my intellect. I am too tired to dispute. When the inspiration returns I will post again--meanwhile, I am among the lurkers.