>>64464417
>I need to lurk moar. If true, that's a "special threat" rating somewhere inb2n Br5 and Br6.
Backtracking to this post in case you haven't seen these yet. The second-gen Granits I was referencing are these "R-Carbide" versions. Pretty sure that's just SiC. We've got a BR4+ able to eat 5.45x39 7N24 cold and 7.62x54R B-32 API at 100m standoff. 6.27lb.
https://voentursnar.ru/catalog/broneplity/7137/
Then we've got a BR5+ rated to stop 7.62x54R 7N37 cold, .338 Lapua non-AP at 300 meters, and 12.7x108mm B-32 API at 800 meters standoff (this should tell you how asinine a proper BR6 plate would be, lol). 7.59lb. Neither weight is counting soft armor and CAP.
https://voentursnar.ru/catalog/broneplity/7744/
Also we've got some kind of "enhanced CAP" from a company called Capytech. It claims to be significantly more effective than a normal climate panel. Have you heard anything about this?
https://voentursnar.ru/catalog/kap/8290/

>Test results: The tests were conducted at the Rzhev Research Institute of Ballistics (NIISC) using soft ballistic packages with a Br2 protection class. Average behind-armor impact value : Without KAP: 1.98 With an EVA analogue: 1.93 With KAP SARUTESN: 1.76 Also, during the tests, the same point was fired at twice with results of 1.7 - 1.8, confirming the viability after impact. Made in Puccia.