>>23055546
>mayo is now ON that thing therefore my statement holds true, semantics are not an argument
no, it isn't on the thing
this is you misunderstanding english
when 95% of people read "mayonnaise goes ON everything", they're gonna picture mayonnaise being poured on top of things, not mayonnaise being a constituent
i know it might seem like semantics but it's really not
there's a bigger list of foods which could be good with mayonnaise as an ingredient than there is a list of foods for which mayonnaise would be good on top of
