>>513436015
The sad part is you actually believe this.

What your statement gets wrong is the assumption that all change is inherently complex, which is just flat out wrong. People have simulated artificial evolution all the way back to the 18th century. Our agriculture itself is a product of this artificial evolution through selective breeding.

Tell me, does picrel look like a complex change? This was done while humans existed. This time frame is utterly dwarfed by the planet's life cycle.

Just look at fossil records from ancient animals and plants, each one is generally simple. Change is a gradual process, complexity comes from distances of time.