Shiloh Hendrix did not simply call a man a 'nigger' on camera. Her crime was much grander. Her crime was not upholding America's most sacrossaint social tenants, doubling down on it, then earning a million dollars prize for this. Even the man she called a nigger on camera was not truly angry once he heard that, he was scared and sounded shocked by standing in front of a person that he truly could not control and who was not pulling any punches because she truly did not care about him or what society would think. Had she been physically stronger than him, she'd have beaten him to a bloody pulp.

This is the crime of Shiloh Hendrix: she showed that all conventions of polite society are failing, that americans cannot get along and won't even bother to try anymore to fit in a society that has nothing to offer.

If Shiloh were in pre-revolution France, she'd have thrown shit at the king. If she were in catholic medieval Europe, she'd have preached atheism. If she were in communist China, she'd have dissed Mao on camera then laughed at it. And her only regret for doing any of this would be that she could not do it a second time. A person like this cannot be allowed to get away.

Shiloh needs to be jailed because if she gets away, she means the end of social conventions in America and ultimately, the dream of good coexistence between different peoples through whites voluntarily giving away space to others.

You may call me a shill, but you know this is the truth. Shiloh's victory would mean the death of american society because americans will not bother anymore to be validated by societal norms.

She needs punishment because if white americans won't bend the knee and be good citizens at will, they must be that by force. I feel sympathy towards her and the poor people of Rochester whose kids must play near a child predator. But agreeing with her means the death of everything America stands for.

>>512075369
You can't use a road as collateral for debt.

If the government in Qianxinan just wanted a new fancy thing they can use as leverage to borrow money, they could just push a state-owned contractor to raise a couple residence building in the capital, Evergrande-style.

What you are saying does not apply to this infrastructure project, which was built probably for a) bragging rights (showing the West how stagnated they are), b) regional integration (which is what local governments in China often try to achieve and is hard in a country that is massive).

Whatever China is doing, we should be doing the same. I advise you to go to a Tier 2 or 3 in China, then compare it to Toulon, Marseille or Bologne in France. China is in another level when it comes to infrastructure. If it all will be useful one day or if it serves ulterior purposes, I do not know, but they are damn hell trying. Already better than us.

You go to France or Brazil, leave for three years and return, barely anything has changed (and things likely are worse). The same does not go in China.