>>2129726
I like the game. It has it's troubles, but that comes along with the ambition. Show me a game of this scope without major problems. The most notable example would be Spore. It's an amazing game that a million people remember fondly, but everyone always knew the game fucking sucked from a gameplay standpoint, like gameplay butter spread over too much bread.

>>22838064
btw it's more like

- original Star Wars (later called ep. 4-5-6): Lucas at his best, perfect alchemy, cool stuff, cult sci-fi movies of the late '70s and early '80s (original versions without CGI added)
- prequels: Lucas tried his best in good faith but he had lost his magic touch and made boring, mediocre high budget movies
- sequels: Disney tried to milk the Star Wars franchise in bad faith and made trash movies that aren't even worth watching (note: I didn't watch the sequels)

moral of the story: things have their own natural duration and it isn't wise to keep them artificially alive for too long, for love of for profit

Star Wars is an excellent saga of movies that reflects the "space opera" genre of the late '70s but in the late '80s it was already perceived as old and it should have been left as it was: an excellent triolgy of sci-fi movies of their time.