>>24649349
Because it doesn't even exist in itself. Now free will is noumenal. So if you beat Kant with a copy of his own book, even to death, it could never effect his freedom because the noumenal is never in the phenomenal.

>>24526210
Just ignore the smoke screen of complex terminology and translate what he is saying into common English and suddenly you can see why Aquinas considered his exact idea and went: "nah, that would be fuckin dumb."