>>82314137
A lack of logistics and support don't make an army magically better at fighting lol, it mere produces a high body count to gain objectives, especially considering most deaths in Ukraine are from artillery bombardments making your point mute. But regardless you inadvertently brought up a good point: the US military excels at logistics. In any war were logistics are the deciding factor the US will win, because it will systematically dismantle the opposing nations ability to conduct the war (like the Kosovo War), but in any war were logistics don't matter, then the US is fucked.
>>82314197
>and high tech TOW missiles.
Maybe a few "elite" units lol. I mean Ukraine has entire units equipped with mosin-nagants. It's more that the Russia's military isn't doing good rather then Ukraine is so great. I will admit Ukraine is a good 3rd world military (about equal to Vietnam in 1975), but lets not kid ourselves about how good they are.