>>718087523
I don't typically post in pokemon threads, I just get riled up when bootlickers like you open their asscheeks to big corporations that couldn't give two shits about you so you can pave the way for worse games.
Scarlet/Violet is the first game in the series I did not buy, but not because of the animations. It was because it was a buggy piece of shit on release for multiplayer. But I'm sure you saw people complaining about the bugs and shook your head, not even having the energy that time to scold them about how impossible it would have been for GF to have competent and adequately staffed coding and R&D teams to make sure they released a finished product to the public.
Give me a laugh anon, tell me why they couldn't release a complete game that wasn't a buggy mess. Let me know how crazy a proposal that was just like it would be a momumental effort to get some mroe animations thrown our way.

>>718087794
>throw more money at it!
Throw more animators at it to make more animations yes. They work with a curated dex of a limited number now, we are post-dexit. You seem to be under the impression that that's not the case now, and GF likes that.
You simultaneously tell me that my desire for more animations is unfeasible, childish, and also already being done. Interesting. A true, actual retard schizo.