>>17900611
>So he was not meaningfully silenced
Nobody claimed he was silenced, only that he faced unwarranted political backlash upon publication of his study. Another strawman. An interested reader can read the Rind team's account of the controversy here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962184900800013
>By its very nature it is incapable of doing so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy
>Except no study has been produced which shows that this confounding is meaningful enough to call for a broad reassessment of CSA?
Not sure why this has any relevance to whether or not confounding is present. Regardless, pic rel. is a review of studies showing that family environment actually is more predictive of harm than "CSA".
>It is my chief piece of evidence that children are not able to consent
So your chief piece of evidence is a non-sequitur?
>>17900615
>has been that a 10 year old is equitably as incapable of consenting to sex as a 14 year old
You imply here that the ability to make decisions among adolescents is more similar to children than it is to adults >>17900198 which is an empirically unsupported statement.
>not that the myelin sheath production and dendritic pruning is not sufficient
This is evidence you provided to attempt to substantiate your argument, not your argument itself, which I have never implied. Also, you aren't providing psychometric evidence, the actual relevant form of evidence, because it would refute what you are claiming.
>The most important bit is the second half
Which does not prove or provide evidence in favour of your assertion regarding the capabilities of 14 year olds; the only way to interpret it as such would require another non-sequitur.
>>17900617
>means that what the myth was describing was super totally pervasive and accepted?
You aren't even attempting to logically follow along with arguments at this point. It seems I've triggered you to the point where you are incapable of doing so.
4chan Search
2 results for "ec2aab3c23f03c4a52c66be3e60fcad1"
>>17843235
>No, the underreporting of CSA is only really common in the specific instance of boys being raped by women
The vast majority of adult-child sex is not reported to police. You have not provided any evidence to substantiate your claim that the majority of adult-child sex comes to the attention of the police. This study shows that only 12% of childhood rapes were ever reported to police: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10391513/
Presumably, voluntary sexual contacts, and less severe sexual contacts, are less likely to be reported.
>therefore it is not a separate variable you can control for
It is a separate variable which can be controlled for and studies which account for it find it is far more predictive of harm than "CSA" status. See the studies in pic rel.
>I assumed you were discussing skew, but as indicated in your next excerpt you do not seem to understand that skew and confounding are entirely different concepts.
You are the one that does not understand the difference between skew and confounding. Controlling for skew in data does not address confounding. You brought up skew when reminded of the need to control for confounders.
>>17843238
>Here they account for "consent"
You only posted an excerpt of a study which I can not investigate.
>here they acknowledge and account for the "confounding"
This isn't even a study. You aren't even reading these. You're just spamming random links you find on Google. Do better.
>>17843242
He isn't even reading the links he's spamming.
>>17843263
>The majority of the sample was African American (56.6%)
>Nearly two-thirds of the sample (60.7%, n = 51) reported the perpetrator of the CSA was a relative
This is a study on groids that were the victims of incest that sought help from psychiatrists. Antis are just getting lazier and lazier.
>No, the underreporting of CSA is only really common in the specific instance of boys being raped by women
The vast majority of adult-child sex is not reported to police. You have not provided any evidence to substantiate your claim that the majority of adult-child sex comes to the attention of the police. This study shows that only 12% of childhood rapes were ever reported to police: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10391513/
Presumably, voluntary sexual contacts, and less severe sexual contacts, are less likely to be reported.
>therefore it is not a separate variable you can control for
It is a separate variable which can be controlled for and studies which account for it find it is far more predictive of harm than "CSA" status. See the studies in pic rel.
>I assumed you were discussing skew, but as indicated in your next excerpt you do not seem to understand that skew and confounding are entirely different concepts.
You are the one that does not understand the difference between skew and confounding. Controlling for skew in data does not address confounding. You brought up skew when reminded of the need to control for confounders.
>>17843238
>Here they account for "consent"
You only posted an excerpt of a study which I can not investigate.
>here they acknowledge and account for the "confounding"
This isn't even a study. You aren't even reading these. You're just spamming random links you find on Google. Do better.
>>17843242
He isn't even reading the links he's spamming.
>>17843263
>The majority of the sample was African American (56.6%)
>Nearly two-thirds of the sample (60.7%, n = 51) reported the perpetrator of the CSA was a relative
This is a study on groids that were the victims of incest that sought help from psychiatrists. Antis are just getting lazier and lazier.