>>41258599
Enabling mental illness, huh... Well, now you got me thinking about the implications and ethics about this seriously. And the only thing I can think of in response to that, is that they would just find another website to congregate to instead, so long as there is an Internet connection for them to explore the World Wide Web with, they will find a way and a place that will attract them anyhow. and will probably enable their mental illness regardless.
So unless we're gonna get rid of the Internet altogether, then the best we can do is to try and preach good mental and spiritual health through natural means first and foremost through online and real world influence, like getting more sunlight exposure outside without sun burning. And the other thing that we can try to do is to mitigate overall damage in the world is to reserve a website where it'll be the far lesser of all evils in regards to possibly enabling the mental illnesses of people who are legitimately schizo and delusional and probably needs serious medical help for their mental health, definitely.
Not trying to support the enablement of mental illness at all here nor do I directly support it at all myself, but maybe /x/ is not so bad compared to other places when all things are considered. Maybe it's a great containment board for the schizos after all. Who really knows? But the Internet is here to stay as far as I'm concerned, and I believe /x/ is here to stay as well, so instead of just targeting outside factors like telling an Anon that they should take their meds, let's also target more fundamentally internal factors in real, everyday life as well.
And I think a great starting example is to simply encourage people to go outside more often everyday into the sunlight and maybe interact with, or at least be in the presence of, other people too. Staying inside all day chronically online is simply terrible for everybody's mental, physical, and spiritual health, among other things as well.
