>>24599453
People who have excess of money, have a moral obligation to help those who are in deficit of money.
This is universally accepted, as reflected in uncountable social programs to give money to those in need (EBT cards etc.), as well as voluntary charity given in millions of dollars.

People who have excess of emotional support, have a moral obligation to help those who are in deficit of emotional support.
This is universally REJECTED, as reflected in the fact, that even people in DESPERATELY SAD positions like those DYING FROM CANCER are being thrown demands, instead of support. Abbhorent.

>All of that circle feels much more ambivalent and embittered about his death because he made it into a narcissistic experience
Absolutely disgusting sentence, what a terrible day to be literate. Be charitable enough to forget about that guy so he can finally rest in peace, without being judged from the other side of the curtain, by some narcissistic faggot who thinks that terminally ill people owe him sacrifice.