>>17955979
>You are a retard
I won't read the rest, hugs. You are completely irrelevant now.
>Nonsense
it's not an argument
>Different kinds of grain were found in multiple Corded Ware sites
Not really. We found it in the CWC territory of Poland, as I said above. You can see the article:
Holm. Hans JJG (2019). >The first finds of wheels, their archaeology and Indo-European terminology in time and space, and the first migrations around the Caucasus
and indeed, not a wide variety of grains were found, The substance and lifestyle still remain primarily pastoralist and nomadic, as well evidenced by the reconstructed culture of the Indo-Europeans as inferred from philology, and analyses, despite typological changes in ceramics, being rudimentary and basic,
indicate sustenance for a nomadic population, since they are remnants. By this, I mean that their material apparatus does not match traditional agricultural practices. The Baltic CWC, for example, did not represent one of the oldest cultures, and they were itinerant livestock herders who brought animal husbandry to the Eastern Baltic between ca. 2900–2300 cal BC. And you're lying, because at the sites there is no grain variety other than that with a high FB influence.
The presence of traces of domesticated fauna in CWC contexts, as well as stable isotope data obtained from human bone collagen, supports a pastoralist lifestyle.
and why do you need to lie? Baltic CWC, for example, only wild plants were collected and used in Narva-Jõesuu IIB; no domesticated plants or signs of plant cultivation were identified.In CWC contexts, Cerealia-type pollen has been found, but the pollen may originate from wild grasses, long-distance transport, or contamination, not necessarily cultivation
the cultivation or use of CWC plants has not been systematically attested by archaeobotanical methods, I'm sorry