>>42630561
>>42630667
Hello again dashfren, its good to see you again. I love what you wrote, especially about the rational mind and the instictual mind, as I myself have been victim of cutting off the latter for most of my life until now. With that said, there are certain concepts I still don't quite understand.

>Old school tulpamancy stops there and says you just gotta deal with what comes through that door - builds character. Nowadays we know that all you have to do is choose to accept stuff we want, and reject stuff we don't.

From what I've been told and have read, A Tupper is conceptually another being in your head, who have their own free will and shouldn't be forced to be the character you want them to be. If they want to be, that's fine, but they get the final say in how they regulate themselves. But based on what you have said, you make it seem like a Tupper really can be molded. I'd love to hear your thoughts on that.

>his isn't an observation of something that existed already, it's a decisive, creative imposition on you and your tulpa's behalf.

I am somewhat confused on what you mean by this, as well as what you mean by differentiating phenomena.

Overall though, I think its helped me see that this isn't that dangerous and I can have control over the process and how much it influences mean. I think that's important because the small taste I had the other day was a rather chaotic energy that I was unused to in my otherwise predictable and safe mind. It felt like a lack of control, and I guess to a certain extent, it is, but no less than looking at an animal or person and seeing what they do. It was an observation and nothing more.