>>64136735
Assuming that I'm actually trying to win and not doing the standard vatnik corrupt officer schtick:
Win conditions for Russia were the land bridge, securing the Donbas and forcing Ukrainian military and political isolation to prepare further schenigans/attacks.
To this end, decapitation strike on Kiev is out, we're going to economically and militarily undermine them.
Kharkiv is still a tempting target and the region will enable an envelopment of the Donbas from the North, so that is still a go.
Southern axis gets the investment, the airforce, the tanks, the VDV, the marines, all hands on deck to capture the coast. Odessa, Mykolaiv, Kherson. Making contact with Transnistria and securing a deep bridgehead over the Dnipro is vital.
Once the land bridge is secured follow up attacks will attempt to outflank the Donbas fortifications from the West.
Mariupol is not assaulted, to preserve the integrity of the quality units that would've been used for such, as well as Russian reputation (This and Bucha is where a lot of the western sympathy came from).
Assuming this works Russia must then goto go on the defensive across the front excepting the attempts to flank the Donbas which leaves the war raging away from the fortification belts where over time the Ukrainian position becomes untenable.
Win condition achieved, sue for peace with a Ukraine that has not had its hero moment(s) and has much less sympathy and support, worse economy and means of keeping up the fight.