>>58216288
>Damn I never knew SOSsubs were a bunch of fucktards. I always assumed it was just an ESL group when it first cropped up on nyaa years ago.
I might be wrong and misremembering but I think their translator and subtitler Akiko is British. She (or it? I don't know if it's a real woman or a "woman) could be foreign and ESL but I don't get that impression. Just a retarded LGBTist.

>Looked at their subs, and the first thing I noticed was some of the retarded naming conventions for the Pokemon and how fucking confusing English can get when you decide to destroy the distinction between singular and plural pronouns because you randomly decided that every time a Pokemon is the subject, you use "they".
Yeah. Even putting aside the obnoxious and insufferable mental illness insertion it's just downright confusing.

>There is a reason singular they only exists online and doesn't exist in real life conversation, even by its retarded proponents
Well it does, but it has nothing to do with mentally ill gays and trannies and other LGBTxyz++! creatures. I'm a native speaker and you'd often use "they" to refer to someone if you don't know whether they're a man or a woman. For example, let's say someone tells you that the doctor at the hospital said your cousin needs to get a blood test. You don't know whether it's a man doctor or a woman doctor. It's completely normal and common speech for you to say to someone else "The doctor talked to my cousin and they [the doctor] said he needs to get a blood test".

I'm from Europe and this whole thing about "they" is really an American left wing tranny mentall illlness thing. And other Americans try to retroactively make out that it's not normal to say they ever in a sentence when referring to a singular individual which is just not true. Death to America.

It's not just in English. I speak another European language in that you'd use the equivalent of they and them to talk about someone when you don't know if they're a man or a woman.