>>64158000
Holyshit, stop foaming at the mouth like a Pavlovian conditioned inbred mongoloid, every time you read the words F-35. It seems to really set you off when you wee F-35+Germany together. Why? It screams of mental illness, seriously.

>You're the one making up ridiculous shit over like 20 f35 and a dozen sparepart corpses and training aircraft.
What, exactly, and I "making up"? How is stating the objective fact Germany is buying the F-35 because it's stealthy, and designing the FCAS to be stealthy, too? Maybe stop seething because you see F-35+Germany together, lower that heart rate, and actually read what I've posted in the context of the posts I was replying to.

>There's like a handful of better examples you could have brought up but you literally chose the one country that specifcally only bought it for nato commitment and not because it performs well.
They specifically bought it because it's the only stealth multirole fighter that's capable of carrying a tactical nuclear gravity bomb. And the only tactical nuclear multirole fighter with a guaranteed ability to fly into highly contested airspace within Russia and China and deliver said tactic nuclear gravity bomb. They could've bought the F-15E second-hand, but we all know it doesn't have the ability to fly within Russia or China uncontested to deliver the B61. They bought it specifically because of its stealth features, and the benefits of having a stealth fighter gives them. Which, also, why they're designing the FCAS to be stealthy from the jump. I specifically brought up Germany AND CHINA because the retard mentioned Germany's and China's supposed "major advances in passive detection" making stealth virtually obsolete (see: >>64148812). Hence, me replying directly to his post asking why, then, is Germany buying F-35s, along with pursuing a stealth fighter in the FCAS program. Just as China has built, and are building nothing but stealth platforms for future use (see: >>64152215).