>>720684117
Well, first off, Andrew Gallimore would fr fr disagree with the opening part, but I'm not an expert unlike him to tell you why you're probably wrong about psychedelics. Beyond that, you’re once again coming across as highly narcissistic by brushing aside the lived experiences of hundreds of thousands of people, along with meticulous, rigorous studies built on vast databases.
We do, in fact, have a body of evidence pointing to the possibility that consciousness survives death and, in some cases, carries into a new life, drawn from studies of thousands of children recalling verifiable past life details, you just never heard of these yet you're *for some reason* feel like you have to play the inquisitor.
Of course, this is paradigm-shifting, ontological shock inducing information so you just have to keep coping, but really I do highly suggest that do your home work and then come to your own conclusions because currently you're parroting other people's thoughts. Start with pic rel, quite good.