>>29403154
>that includes Q
you retards are always so obvious--and I'm telling this literally to help you, please shill in a way I can't notice, I'm begging you--you never ever actually make an argument from evidence.
It's always just some naked claim, maybe followed by ridicule, or as you did here preceded by 'henlo-fellow-chuds.png' trying to establish credibility.

Actual people trying to get what they believe is the truth out, are DYING to dump evidence on you. All you faggots ever do is shotgun claims.
git gud boyos the hour is late.

>>29360342
if we weren't winning, you wouldn't be here quisling.
When we win, we're going to come after 100% of you retarded faggot traitors.

>>29346770
>if you don't show it's 30 seconds
did you forget how you stated this derail nigger?
you pointed out I posted faster than 30 seconds.
> you're a fed for sure
why would a fed post literally the best evidence available that the US government did 911?
Here's a better question:
Who would counter signal such a poster?
and what does he deserve for doing so?
hint
vid rel

>>5955834
>So the argument here is the camera crew don't have heads?
yeah you nailed it
addressing an argument fairly is the hallmark of good faith.
If you're not approaching in good faith... well... that must mean you're defending the preparators. And that gets pretty fucking dark pretty quick