>>515307449
They did wake up, but they are powerless, their rage will disspate on the internet as they vent.
words will get more radical, but ultimately nothing will come of it.
This is why stability is priority no.1 of containment.
If the people who saw this had no internet, they felt they had no way to vent, they would start shooting, police, nigs, shitlibs.
But people are in a way bribed by the small slice of political freedom they have.
Voting is a form of venting
Saying "niggers must go" or something similar on Xitter is a form of venting
The FEELING (not actual but feeling) of being radicalized is a form of venting
If you want shooters to make things happen.
>destroy their belief in democracy
(they must genuinely believe the process does not work, not that its slow or inefficient or "we'll get 'em next time" but literally that democracy is a tool to suppress them)
>destroy their ability to vent
The anger, hatred, and rage needs to build up with no outlet, if they screech onto the internet or to their friends it will dissipate because shouting "nigger" is cathartic, they need to be censored or have no where to speak at all.
How does this happen?
It doesnt, the internet would need to go out, people would need to actually live hard lives.
No country that has social welfare or mass public services will have a radical element succeed.
