>>40975377
a simple frendly greentext would worked wonders so stop being so lasy AND hostile.

now lets brake it down:
>The cause of the downward accelerative force is electrostatics which is provable; density and buoyancy sort the rest out. Gravity is not needed, is stupid, and doesn’t even hold up conceptually or theoretically
Did you by the way notice the circular definition you did here?
Buoyancy depends on a reference acceleration term. If you remove g, you have buoyancy defined in terms of itself—an infinite regress.

So what replaces g in your equation, with correct units (m/s2) and a numeric value near 9.81 at sea level? Otherwise, your ‘explanation’ is just a tautology.